20-06-2009, 06:32 AM
The mock paper to be attempted in advance of the event at Signet is just about to be emailed to those registered and will also be posted here when this has occurred.
To get the best value from the exercise you should not cheat by looking at it when downloading / printing well before you actually sit down to do the mock. Rather you should be disciplined enough to take no cogniscence until the time set aside actually to attempt under suitable examlike conditions; i.e. one uninterupted stint, closed book, 10 minutes to read then 90 minutes to write your answers. Consider responding to the attached poll only after having attempted the paper.
Precisely the way we will organise and run this training day will depend upon the quantity and quality of the answers we receive by the submission deadline. Hence the preparatory work should be useful to you on several counts:
1. the experience of putting yourself to the test in exam conditions,
2. the opportunity to get personalised feedback on these efforts sufficiently prior to the exam for you to have time to address issues,
3. the ability to influence the sessions to be of particular help to address any of your areas of difficulty.
Similarly to last year, Reuben will be running the sessions related to Control Tables (part A) and I'll be tackling the written answer questions (part B). These will run in parallel throughout the day and in general (subject to considerations such as physical space) students will have the free choice of which class to attend for each timetabled session. Last year we found that around 30% attended all the part B sessions (reflecting the proportion that attempt 3 such questions in the exam) but a further 30% attended at least one of these sessions by foregoing the concurrent topic being covered within the Control Table session plan (don't forget that those deciding to offer Control Tables in the exam also need to tackle one written question). Inevitably there were slots when some wanted to be in both sessions, but in life one has to make choices and it generally seemed to work out pretty well.
There are 10 written questions and time will only allow a minority to be covered in any depth; hence the answers submitted will be taken as defining:
a) the level of interest in a parrticular topic
b) the range of depth of understanding / competence in certain areas.
However I recognise that the selection of questions to attempt in the mock must be based upon an individual's assessment of which they can currently do the best; this can be a bit different to the ones that would like to get help on during a training session. Hence when making the selection I will also take into account the results of the attached poll and any personal emails received. Therefore please make use of the interactive facility to contribute to customising the day to best suit your aspirations (it is counter productive to vote for the lot; try to restrict yourself to 3 or 4 so as to distinguish your top priority items). It may be that you'd want to vote for some of the questions you attempted but then realised that didn't go as well as you'd initially hoped; however you may well want to vote for one that you wondered about attempting but were deterred because of concerns over one part- you felt you might actually know it but weren't too sure if that was what was needed by the question.
To get the best value from the exercise you should not cheat by looking at it when downloading / printing well before you actually sit down to do the mock. Rather you should be disciplined enough to take no cogniscence until the time set aside actually to attempt under suitable examlike conditions; i.e. one uninterupted stint, closed book, 10 minutes to read then 90 minutes to write your answers. Consider responding to the attached poll only after having attempted the paper.
Precisely the way we will organise and run this training day will depend upon the quantity and quality of the answers we receive by the submission deadline. Hence the preparatory work should be useful to you on several counts:
1. the experience of putting yourself to the test in exam conditions,
2. the opportunity to get personalised feedback on these efforts sufficiently prior to the exam for you to have time to address issues,
3. the ability to influence the sessions to be of particular help to address any of your areas of difficulty.
Similarly to last year, Reuben will be running the sessions related to Control Tables (part A) and I'll be tackling the written answer questions (part B). These will run in parallel throughout the day and in general (subject to considerations such as physical space) students will have the free choice of which class to attend for each timetabled session. Last year we found that around 30% attended all the part B sessions (reflecting the proportion that attempt 3 such questions in the exam) but a further 30% attended at least one of these sessions by foregoing the concurrent topic being covered within the Control Table session plan (don't forget that those deciding to offer Control Tables in the exam also need to tackle one written question). Inevitably there were slots when some wanted to be in both sessions, but in life one has to make choices and it generally seemed to work out pretty well.
There are 10 written questions and time will only allow a minority to be covered in any depth; hence the answers submitted will be taken as defining:
a) the level of interest in a parrticular topic
b) the range of depth of understanding / competence in certain areas.
However I recognise that the selection of questions to attempt in the mock must be based upon an individual's assessment of which they can currently do the best; this can be a bit different to the ones that would like to get help on during a training session. Hence when making the selection I will also take into account the results of the attached poll and any personal emails received. Therefore please make use of the interactive facility to contribute to customising the day to best suit your aspirations (it is counter productive to vote for the lot; try to restrict yourself to 3 or 4 so as to distinguish your top priority items). It may be that you'd want to vote for some of the questions you attempted but then realised that didn't go as well as you'd initially hoped; however you may well want to vote for one that you wondered about attempting but were deterred because of concerns over one part- you felt you might actually know it but weren't too sure if that was what was needed by the question.