Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2016 Q10 Aspect Sequence Chart
#1
Hi all,

I am looking at 2016 Q10 and I just want you guys to confirm my assumptions are correct, because the assumptions I think I'm using are creating an ungodly complicated aspect sequence diagram, and I havn't come across such a complicated one in any study materials so far which is making me think my assumptions are incorrect.

I have gotten all my info from the modern signalling handbook 5th edition or from the IRSE mod3 study guide.

Assumption 1: all signals capable of showing stop, therefore no distant signals
Assumption 2: using standard overlap of 180m, i.e. there are no reduced overlaps
Assumption 3: Signal sighting is all OK, i.e. reading times are all above 8 seconds, there are no obstructions to this, as such I don't need any banner/splitting banner repeater signals.
Assumption 4: The signals are spaced too close for 3-aspect so it must be 4 aspect signalling (modern signalling handbook page 62 says 3 aspect ones are between 1600 and 2400 m apart)

Assumption 5: Signal 23, the turnout is 130kmph down to 80kmph, this delta is >16kmph so I need approach control, the initial speed is >96kmph so it can't be "Approach control from yellow preceeded by a double yellow" type, and Approach control from Red seems too restrictive for this so I'm thinking Approach control from yellow with flashing yellows. 

Assumption 6: it says this layout has stopping and non-stopping trains on the up fast so that means Signal 27 turnout has the same approach control as assumption 5

Assumption 7: Signal 29 the turnout is 80kmph down to 65kmph, as this delta is <16kmph I do not need approach control,


I guess the fact that I think 23 and 27 both need approach control with flashing yellows is making my aspect sequence diagram huge and complicated. What do you think of these assumptions?

Oliver
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)