(12-01-2017, 09:14 AM)mailmesashi Wrote: Hi,
I have a query related to foul tracks.
General definition of foul tracks states that these are to be proved directly in the signal aspect controls, to
confirm that any unauthorised movement foul of the route replaces the signal. But, if the POP groups are defined for that scheme, then this unauthorised movement will be detected as an overrun. In such cases, is it required to include foul tracks in the aspect level.
Thank You.
Good question- what do you think is the best answer?
It might be a good one for IRSE to ask in the exam ...........
If you are actually asking what is the answer that adherence to RGS and NR standards would suggest, then the simple answer would be yes.
The reason why I say that is that compliance to the standard that used to be GK/RT0060 (now transferred to NR's Signalling Principles & Application Handbook) demands it.
However I do not believe that this has been considered for revision since the implementation of overrun protection in the control system. Therefore although it states what it does, it is worth considering if it still should........
There are certainly some arguments that it should be retained-
A) control system is at best SIL2
B) the foul track could be occupied without route cancellation via POP group having occurred (e.g. The signaller could deliberately or by error left a "SPAD inhibit" applied incorrectly)
C) the foul track could be occupied by a vehicle moving where it should not when working within a possession- this vehicle may always have been beyond the protecting signal and thus no SPAD for the SPAD detection to register and initiate POP Group.
Conversely there are some arguments that it should be removed from the requirements; can you think of any?
Like much in signalling, it is a balance and opinions will differ. Think about what risk the control is intended to mitigate, make an assessment of likelihood and severity without the mitigation and with the mitigation. Consider the costs of the mitigation and indeed the other effects and associated costs including those due to reduction in various RAMS metrics). Determine the optimum balance of the various risks; if having done this you are certain that it is beneficial NOT to include foul tracks in the aspect then word your derogation application, support it with safety argument and see if you can convince others.
.