(06-10-2010, 08:40 PM)Peter Wrote: (06-10-2010, 06:41 PM)KonduriRaghavakumar Wrote: Giving 20 minutes time for reading the question paper is also the good idea where we can select which question we have to answer and important points in them.
The reading time is only 20mins for certain exam centres in non English speaking locations. Personally I think this is odd as this means that a native English speaker at such an exam centre gets 20 minutes reading time, but the non-native English speaker at a UK centre only gets 10 minutes.
Reading time always used to be 5 mins for every paper. Having as a UK student a non-native with English as a second laguage some years ago, I became acutely aware of the problems that are posed.
I campaigned for an extension to 10 minutes in such cases, my idea being that selected students could be set off in the exam room early whilst others were then called in to take their places. I was told this was not practicable; having never actually run an exam centre I could not argue otherwise.
I did however achieve the extension of time to 10 minutes for ALL candidates; not my original aim but some victory and indeed it was one of the factors contributing I think to the eventual success of my particular candidate.
The extension to 20 minutes seems to have arisen for the first time last year- I am not sure to where it applies but certainly India, but I assume not Australia but perhaps Hong Kong etc.
It would be good if candidates at the various centres can let us know how much time they got; also whether adding candidate number and sheet number had to be within the exam time aor could be added later.
When we mentioned the issue at last years's Exam Review, it did seem to me that the exam committee itself weren't actually aware of this 20 minute rule , although they did not actually directly admit this, that was certainly the impression I got.
Definitely I believe that this issue should be brought more out into the open; to me it is a question of being fair to everyone (and this certainly does not mean having to treat everyone identically; compensation for having to answer in a second language certainly seems appropriate, but the place where the exam is undertaken does not seem of great relevance.)