Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2017 - Mod 7 - Q2
#1
My colleague and I both had an attempt at Q2 for mod 7 2017 paper, we reviewed our answers and this is a combination of both our attempts- 

The 3rd part of the question we had very different replies for, which shows we both interpreted the question differently. As you can see in the answer the bottom section has been written as "requirements" which is how I interpreted the question. Any advise on this would be greatly welcome, as I still do not know what is being asked-which might be reflected in the answer.

Regards
TF


Attached Files
.docx   Mod 7 - 2017 - Q2 combined attempt.docx (Size: 34.99 KB / Downloads: 18)
Reply
#2
Afternoon TF,

On the whole this looks like a good answer to me.

I think the latter part of the question is asking how the information you have gathered will be used overall, i.e. what processes the model may feed into, in effect how will this model initiate a V cycle? I think the response you have given is good, it may also be worthwhile linking this to informing requirements specifications documents. For example your model would be likely to inform operational requirements specifications (you hint at this talking about normal and degraded working), client requirements documents or system architecture models.

From my perspective the overall answer to the question would have scored highly as written so well done.
Reply
#3
Really appreciate the feedback -especially on the last section- we were clutching at straws on that one as we couldn't quite grasp what was being asked. Things are a lot clearer now. Thank you.
Tf
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)